Milk, It Does a Body Good

Submitted by FreedomDemocrats on Thu, 2007-09-06 09:00.

Lots of Americans are milk drinkers. How many of us think that the typical American day starts out with a glass of milk, or perhaps some milk and cereal. I feel like an exception to American culture. While I'm not lactose intolerant, I've never been a fan of milk. It's flavorless to me; I prefer my milk to come in cheese form.

I'm accepting of other people drinking milk, that's their choice. But some radicals like their milk raw; they claim it is better for you and tastes better. Maybe that's why all milk tastes flavorless to me. Because of their raw preferences they risk persecution by the state. And so the Campaign for Real Milk was born.

Back in the 20s, Americans could buy fresh raw whole milk, real clabber and buttermilk, luscious naturally yellow butter, fresh farm cheeses and cream in various colors and thicknesses. Today's milk is accused of causing everything from allergies to heart disease to cancer, but when Americans could buy Real Milk, these diseases were rare. In fact, a supply of high quality dairy products was considered vital to American security and the economic well being of the nation.

What's needed today is a return to humane, non-toxic, pasture-based dairying and small-scale traditional processing.

Like most aspects of agricultural and public health regulation, laws requiring the pasteurization of milk are built on false assumptions about how our food is produced. Within the framework of dirty industrial agriculture, pasteurization may make a lot of sense. But applying them to small-scale traditional styles of agriculture is like putting a square peg into a round hole. It burdens the small operation with additional fixed costs and effectively ruins their one advantage over industrial milk: quality.

For more on the struggles of small farmers in the face of government statism, check out a new book by the "Christian-libertarian-environmentalist-lunatic farmer" Joel Salatin called "Everything I Want To Do Is Illegal."

Pasteurization

#4813 On Thu, 2007 09 06 19:11 nonluddite said,

"Like most aspects of agricultural and public health regulation, laws requiring the pasteurization of milk are built on false assumptions about how our food is produced. Within the framework of dirty industrial agriculture, pasteurization may make a lot of sense. But applying them to small-scale traditional styles of agriculture is like putting a square peg into a round hole."

I'm sure the problem that Pasteur was trying to fix in 1862 FRANCE was "dirty industrial agriculture", and not the contamination inevitable with a product produced from the udder of a cow. I'm sure the modern medical method of sterilizing the udder with alcohol and the use of stainless steel milking machines would make this quaint, but I doubt that what's the "Real Milk" people are going for.

As for me, I'll just put them in the same category as Christian Scientists and anti-vaccine free-loaders--don't come bitching to me (or the government) when your kid gets sick or people think it's child abuse!

The American Civil Liberties Union—Protecting the Bill of Rights…except for Amendments 2, 9, and 10!--nonluddite