Shane Cory Should Immediately Resign as Executive Director of the Libertarian Party

Submitted by ka1igu1a on Sun, 2008-04-27 05:11.

As a dues paying member of the National Libertarian Party and a member of the NC state Libertarian Party, I urge all fellow LP members to demand the immediate resignation of Shane Cory as Executive Director of the Libertarian Party for issuing a Press Release implying that LP Members support the "Federal War" on Child Pornography.

Is this what we are supposed to be supporting Shane?

I don't support any umpteenth Federal War on everything under the sun, whether drugs, terrorism, pornography, crime, smoking, obesity, french fries, bad posture, or whatever.

If Shane Cory wants to be a lackey for Bob Barr because Bob doesn't like Mary Ruwart's answer written in a book ten years ago, then Shane should officially resign as a salaried officer of the LP and join the Barr campaign. And Steve Gordon, if you are reading this post, this is bullshit. This isn't the Republican Party, this is the Libertarian Party. I'll be damned if I'm going to put up with this bullshit in the LP. If Bob Barr is nominated and Shane Cory is still drawing a salary from the LP, I'm writing in comedian Doug Stanhope for president as a protest.


RP doesn't support the "federal war on child porn."

#6333 On Sun, 2008 04 27 16:07 Paige_Michael-S... said,

Not really sure why Shane Cory is doing this. I'm not sure he's a "lackey" for the Barr campaign, and I'm not really even sure if Barr supports the "war," but this is just weird.

Child porn is a state issue. Period.

Very Confused . . .

#6336 On Sun, 2008 04 27 20:26 FreedomDemocrats said,

I read through the news article and I didn't notice this concern being addressed, but it has to be obvious. What prevents someone with some knowledge of the link's FBI nature from trying to encourage people to click on the link by describing it as something completely different (Click here for free hamburgers). We know that police will sometimes push drug raids in low-income neighbors with little to no evidence just to make it look like they are doing something. What's next?

http_referral url would be logged, I imagine

#6337 On Tue, 2008 04 29 01:01 ka1igu1a said,

The bigger concern is how many people hijack onto someone else's home/business unsecure wireless networks. It would be the homeowner or business owner who would get raided in this instance...